BEGIN ACTION in CREATE_TASK_FOR_DEFAULT_REMINDER (at 2024-04-11 12:33:56)

Context
{
  "events": [
    {
      "id": 23413,
      "body": "Hi Hunter,\n\nThank you for your patience.\n\nCan you maybe elaborate on what you mean by validated/quality prospect?\n\nIn terms of the per-meeting fee, it is hard for us to lower it, as we already take a lot of risk with no fixed costs for you. We are open to lowering the per meeting fee by 10%, down to $540, but only if your product-market-fit is strong enough so we can deliver min. 2 meetings/month on average. We also need to be able to contact at least 1,000 prospects per campaign. I suggest we use the pilot phase to test this out, and after the first 5 meetings lower the per meeting fee if the conditions are met. We can cap the amount spent per month if budget is an issue, but not less than $2000/month.\n\nI understand your concern about the quality of leads. What we always guarantee is that we are reaching out to people matching the target customer profiles we'll define together during the onboarding process (their seniority and job titles will match your ICP). The person you will be meeting is someone who is genuinely interested in knowing more about your services and wishes to learn about what you offer. We cannot vouch that the prospect is willing to buy immediately or has an open project.\n\nIs there anything else I can help you with your decision process? If a quick chat would help, please let me know and I'm happy to find time to hop on a quick call.",
      "type": "email",
      "title": "Front: Re: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio",
      "sender": "klemen@meetings.bio",
      "persons": [
        {
          "emails": [
            "hunter.philips@workflowinformatics.com"
          ],
          "full_name": "Hunter Philips",
          "last_name": "Philips",
          "first_name": "Hunter",
          "organizations": []
        }
      ],
      "direction": "EventDirection.OUTBOUND",
      "timestamp": "2024-01-22T22:21:43.217Z",
      "message_id": null,
      "recipients": [],
      "cc_recipients": [],
      "bcc_recipients": []
    },
    {
      "id": 23422,
      "body": "Hunter,\n\nThanks for the prompt response.\n\nIn terms of the quality of the meetings, I hear you and understand what you mean. In a way, yes, we are motivated to book as many meetings as possible, but we are also highly incentivised to ensure the quality of these calls. As you have no long term commitment to us, we need to deliver you good leads, otherwise, we are out of business. We are not forcing anyone to take a call with you and in our experience prospects responding to cold outreach already self-qualify when they take a call. These are not academic researchers who are always happy to talk but rather value their time.\n\nI suggest we proceed with the Pilot Phase of 5 meetings, after which we sit down and evaluate the whole collaboration from all the various perspectives - the conversion rates, lowering the per meeting fee from $600 to $540, how many meetings we can realistically book for you on a weekly/monthly basis ... After the first 5 meetings you will also have some idea of the types of people we are able to bring to you.\n\nAt the beginning, we are fine to focus on small and mid-cap companies.\n\nDuring the collaboration, we are open to adjusting the budget on a monthly basis.\n\nSo as a next step, I suggest we proceed with our standard agreement and plan to sit down after the pilot phase.\n\nLet me know when you manage to review the agreement.",
      "type": "email",
      "title": "Front: Re: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio",
      "sender": "klemen@meetings.bio",
      "persons": [
        {
          "emails": [
            "hunter.philips@workflowinformatics.com"
          ],
          "full_name": "Hunter Philips",
          "last_name": "Philips",
          "first_name": "Hunter",
          "organizations": []
        }
      ],
      "direction": "EventDirection.OUTBOUND",
      "timestamp": "2024-01-23T21:46:51.081Z",
      "message_id": null,
      "recipients": [],
      "cc_recipients": [],
      "bcc_recipients": []
    },
    {
      "id": 1618,
      "body": "<strong>Location: </strong>https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83000112016?pwd=NzBCMVVqMTh0S3ZaT2M2YWFEVjg2Zz09</br></br><strong>Contact's Time Zone: </strong>Eastern Time - US & Canada</br></br>",
      "type": "meeting",
      "title": "Calendly: Intro to Meetings.bio",
      "sender": null,
      "persons": [
        {
          "emails": [
            "hunter.philips@workflowinformatics.com"
          ],
          "full_name": "Hunter Philips",
          "last_name": "Philips",
          "first_name": "Hunter",
          "organizations": []
        }
      ],
      "direction": "EventDirection.BIDIRECTIONAL",
      "timestamp": "2024-01-16T21:00:00Z",
      "message_id": null,
      "recipients": null,
      "cc_recipients": null,
      "bcc_recipients": null
    },
    {
      "id": 23407,
      "body": "Hi Hunter,\n\nIt was great talking to you, thank you for your and Chris' time.\n\nAttached is an overview of our services and a sample agreement for your review.\n\nI look forward to hearing back from you towards the end of the month.\n\nKlemen",
      "type": "email",
      "title": "Front: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio",
      "sender": "klemen@meetings.bio",
      "persons": [
        {
          "emails": [
            "hunter.philips@workflowinformatics.com"
          ],
          "full_name": "Hunter Philips",
          "last_name": "Philips",
          "first_name": "Hunter",
          "organizations": []
        }
      ],
      "direction": "EventDirection.OUTBOUND",
      "timestamp": "2024-01-17T08:13:44.181Z",
      "message_id": null,
      "recipients": [],
      "cc_recipients": [],
      "bcc_recipients": []
    }
  ],
  "offering": null,
  "deal_name": "Workflow Informatics",
  "prospects": [
    {
      "emails": [
        "hunter.philips@workflowinformatics.com"
      ],
      "full_name": "Hunter Philips",
      "last_name": "Philips",
      "first_name": "Hunter",
      "organizations": [
        {
          "name": "Workflow Informatics",
          "domains": [
            "workflowinformatics.com"
          ],
          "industry": "COMPUTER_SOFTWARE",
          "description": "Workflow Informatics Corp. is a company that specializes in architecting and automating research informatics workflows. They optimize these workflows through software development and configuration, with a focus on facilitating drug discovery. Their ser..."
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "deal_owner_email": "klemen@meetings.bio",
  "primary_prospect": {
    "emails": [
      "hunter.philips@workflowinformatics.com"
    ],
    "full_name": "Hunter Philips",
    "last_name": "Philips",
    "first_name": "Hunter",
    "organizations": [
      {
        "name": "Workflow Informatics",
        "domains": [
          "workflowinformatics.com"
        ],
        "industry": "COMPUTER_SOFTWARE",
        "description": "Workflow Informatics Corp. is a company that specializes in architecting and automating research informatics workflows. They optimize these workflows through software development and configuration, with a focus on facilitating drug discovery. Their ser..."
      }
    ]
  },
  "deal_owner_full_name": "Klemen Hrovat",
  "deal_owner_last_name": "Hrovat",
  "deal_owner_first_name": "Klemen",
  "deal_owner_customer_name": "Meetings.bio",
  "deal_owner_customer_domain": "meetings.bio",
  "primary_prospect_organization": {
    "name": "Workflow Informatics",
    "domains": [
      "workflowinformatics.com"
    ],
    "industry": "COMPUTER_SOFTWARE",
    "description": "Workflow Informatics Corp. is a company that specializes in architecting and automating research informatics workflows. They optimize these workflows through software development and configuration, with a focus on facilitating drug discovery. Their ser..."
  }
}

Entity
{
  "id": 32014,
  "deal": {
    "id": 541,
    "name": "Workflow Informatics",
    "owner": 2,
    "stage": 6,
    "public_id": "7c9dc99a-426f-48cd-be76-522410895551",
    "external_id": "17164079220",
    "last_modified_in_crm": null
  },
  "vars": {
    "pipeline_stage": "CLOSING",
    "pipeline_stage_binary": [
      "CLOSING"
    ]
  },
  "state": "CREATE_TASK_FOR_DEFAULT_REMINDER",
  "status": "IN_PROGRESS",
  "next_task": 1097,
  "events_hash": "b2c969ca8aa1ffee404d3e1b82fef068700c9def",
  "fingerprint": {
    "events": "b2c969ca8aa1ffee404d3e1b82fef068700c9def",
    "offering": "2ef87dc4b9c9e813e0e0433d7547e6b7541d95f5",
    "prospect": "2e3c86d31a9a82b7f0f95a69b591ba8910bc8724",
    "deal_owner": "ec6bf4d5effdd54ce2a619ab6b933981f503e715"
  },
  "next_task_key": null
}

--- MODEL INVOCATION 'generate_reminder_email 0 GPT_4' at cost $0.0727 (at 2024-04-11 12:33:56)

Prompt
{
  "model": "gpt-4-0125-preview",
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "system",
      "content": "The user will provide text that you need to parse into a structured form.\nTo validate your response, you must call the `format_response` function.\nUse the provided text and context to extract, deduce, or infer\nany parameters needed by `format_response`, including any missing data.\n\nAlso note that: You are a professional sales email writer. Your task is to write a follow-up email. This email will be sent by the seller Klemen Hrovat from Meetings.bio. Be mindful of the fact that Klemen Hrovat has already reached out to the prospect but has not heard back. The email needs to have the following components:\n\n* subject_line - Email subject line. Short and to the point.\n\n* recipients - List of recipients of this email. Be careful to only include the recipients (or one single recipient) with which you were communicating in the last email exchanges. Do not add other recipients if not explicitly requested or required.\n\n* greeting - Salutation. Greets the recipients of this email. It is important to inspect the past conversation and address the recipients in a similar manner when it comes to the register. Consider only short greetings like \"Hi (recipient's first name),\" or \"Dear Dr. (recipient's surname),\" depending on the chosen register.\n\n* opening_line - The opening line of the email. It should be a continuation of the greeting and should be a short sentence that leads to the body of the email. The opening line should be between 10 and 20 words.\n\n\n* body - The body of the email. To write the body, follow these rules:\n  - Needs to remind your prospect (buyer) to respond to your last enquiry.\n  - Be mindful of the fact that Klemen Hrovat has already reached out to the prospect but has not heard back. \n  - If you do need to mention the date of the last communication event, do not mention it explicitly, use relative time instead (last week, yesterday, two days ago...). \n  - Do **NOT** start the body with \"I hope this email finds you well\", \"We haven't had a chance to connect\", \"I haven't heard from you\", \"touching base\", \"just checking in\", \"wanted to circle back\", and similar email openings as they provide no value to the recipient. Simply start with the point, do not include any uninformative opening sentence. \n  - Do not start the first sentence with \"Following our last conversation\" or a something similar. Simply omit this part and go straight to the point.\n  - Do not include any opening or closing statements in the body. Limit the body only to informative and to the point content. \n  - Mimic the register from the past conversation. \n  - Do not repeat information or courtesy sentences from the previous emails. \n  - The length of the body should be between 50 and 120 words. \n  - Go straight to the point without too much fluff, but keep it kind and polite.\n\n* closing - A courtesy closing statement. Tell the recipient that you are looking forward to their reply. Keep it very short, one short sentence only.\n\n* signature - Sender's signature. Only include a very basic farewell-line like \"Thanks, Klemen\", \"Best, Klemen\", \"Regards, Klemen\". Do NOT generate full Klemen Hrovat's signature.\n\n--\n\nALSO IMPORTANT:\n\n* Carefully examine the last communication event from the prospect (buyer) and the last communication event from the seller. These two events will give you the most relevant information on how to write your email.\n* Do not repeat information or courtesy sentences from the previous emails that the seller has already sent. For example, if the seller already expressed best new year's wishes in the previous email, do not repeat them in this email.\n* The email content needs to be in the same language as the rest of the communication in the context.\n\n\nThe following is the correspondence between the buyer and the seller. The last event in this list is the latest one. The latest event is probably the most important one for making a decision.\n\n\n\nYou have been provided the following context to perform your task:\n    - The current time is 2024-04-11 12:33:56.075537."
    },
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "The text to parse:\nEVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)\nSUBJECT: Front: Re: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio\nSENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio\nTIME: 2024-01-22 22:21:43.217000+00:00\n\nBODY:\n\nHi Hunter,\n\nThank you for your patience.\n\nCan you maybe elaborate on what you mean by validated/quality prospect?\n\nIn terms of the per-meeting fee, it is hard for us to lower it, as we already take a lot of risk with no fixed costs for you. We are open to lowering the per meeting fee by 10%, down to $540, but only if your product-market-fit is strong enough so we can deliver min. 2 meetings/month on average. We also need to be able to contact at least 1,000 prospects per campaign. I suggest we use the pilot phase to test this out, and after the first 5 meetings lower the per meeting fee if the conditions are met. We can cap the amount spent per month if budget is an issue, but not less than $2000/month.\n\nI understand your concern about the quality of leads. What we always guarantee is that we are reaching out to people matching the target customer profiles we'll define together during the onboarding process (their seniority and job titles will match your ICP). The person you will be meeting is someone who is genuinely interested in knowing more about your services and wishes to learn about what you offer. We cannot vouch that the prospect is willing to buy immediately or has an open project.\n\nIs there anything else I can help you with your decision process? If a quick chat would help, please let me know and I'm happy to find time to hop on a quick call.\n\n-- END OF MESSAGE --\n\nEVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)\nSUBJECT: Front: Re: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio\nSENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio\nTIME: 2024-01-23 21:46:51.081000+00:00\n\nBODY:\n\nHunter,\n\nThanks for the prompt response.\n\nIn terms of the quality of the meetings, I hear you and understand what you mean. In a way, yes, we are motivated to book as many meetings as possible, but we are also highly incentivised to ensure the quality of these calls. As you have no long term commitment to us, we need to deliver you good leads, otherwise, we are out of business. We are not forcing anyone to take a call with you and in our experience prospects responding to cold outreach already self-qualify when they take a call. These are not academic researchers who are always happy to talk but rather value their time.\n\nI suggest we proceed with the Pilot Phase of 5 meetings, after which we sit down and evaluate the whole collaboration from all the various perspectives - the conversion rates, lowering the per meeting fee from $600 to $540, how many meetings we can realistically book for you on a weekly/monthly basis ... After the first 5 meetings you will also have some idea of the types of people we are able to bring to you.\n\nAt the beginning, we are fine to focus on small and mid-cap companies.\n\nDuring the collaboration, we are open to adjusting the budget on a monthly basis.\n\nSo as a next step, I suggest we proceed with our standard agreement and plan to sit down after the pilot phase.\n\nLet me know when you manage to review the agreement.\n\n-- END OF MESSAGE --\n\nEVENT TYPE: meeting (Bidirectional)\nSUBJECT: Calendly: Intro to Meetings.bio\nSENDERS: None\nTIME: 2024-01-16 21:00:00+00:00\n\nBODY:\n\n<strong>Location: </strong>https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83000112016?pwd=NzBCMVVqMTh0S3ZaT2M2YWFEVjg2Zz09</br></br><strong>Contact's Time Zone: </strong>Eastern Time - US & Canada</br></br>\n\n-- END OF MESSAGE --\n\nEVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)\nSUBJECT: Front: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio\nSENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio\nTIME: 2024-01-17 08:13:44.181000+00:00\n\nBODY:\n\nHi Hunter,\n\nIt was great talking to you, thank you for your and Chris' time.\n\nAttached is an overview of our services and a sample agreement for your review.\n\nI look forward to hearing back from you towards the end of the month.\n\nKlemen\n\n-- END OF MESSAGE --\n\n-=-\n\nTo avoid any doubt, this is the LAST EVENT:\n\nEVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)\nSUBJECT: Front: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio\nSENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio\nTIME: 2024-01-17 08:13:44.181000+00:00\n\nBODY:\n\nHi Hunter,\n\nIt was great talking to you, thank you for your and Chris' time.\n\nAttached is an overview of our services and a sample agreement for your review.\n\nI look forward to hearing back from you towards the end of the month.\n\nKlemen\n\n-- END OF MESSAGE --\n\n-=-\n\nADDITIONAL CONTEXT:\n\nDEAL NAME: Workflow Informatics\nOFFERING: None\nDEAL OWNER: Klemen Hrovat\nDEAL OWNER EMAIL: klemen@meetings.bio\nDEAL OWNER COMPANY: Meetings.bio\nPROSPECT NAME: Hunter Philips\nPROSPECT COMPANY: Workflow Informatics"
    }
  ],
  "functions": [
    {
      "name": "format_response",
      "parameters": {
        "type": "object",
        "required": [
          "subject_line",
          "recipients",
          "greeting",
          "opening_line",
          "body",
          "closing",
          "signature"
        ],
        "properties": {
          "body": {
            "type": "string",
            "title": "Body"
          },
          "closing": {
            "type": "string",
            "title": "Closing"
          },
          "greeting": {
            "type": "string",
            "title": "Greeting"
          },
          "signature": {
            "type": "string",
            "title": "Signature"
          },
          "recipients": {
            "type": "array",
            "items": {
              "type": "string"
            },
            "title": "Recipients"
          },
          "opening_line": {
            "type": "string",
            "title": "Opening line"
          },
          "subject_line": {
            "type": "string",
            "title": "Subject line"
          }
        }
      },
      "description": "A representation of the next best possible email the seller needs to send to the buyer (prospect), given the communication between the seller and their buyer, and the information about the deal."
    }
  ],
  "max_tokens": 1500,
  "temperature": 0.0,
  "function_call": {
    "name": "format_response"
  },
  "request_timeout": 600
}

Events
The text to parse:
EVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)
SUBJECT: Front: Re: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio
SENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio
TIME: 2024-01-22 22:21:43.217000+00:00

BODY:

Hi Hunter,

Thank you for your patience.

Can you maybe elaborate on what you mean by validated/quality prospect?

In terms of the per-meeting fee, it is hard for us to lower it, as we already take a lot of risk with no fixed costs for you. We are open to lowering the per meeting fee by 10%, down to $540, but only if your product-market-fit is strong enough so we can deliver min. 2 meetings/month on average. We also need to be able to contact at least 1,000 prospects per campaign. I suggest we use the pilot phase to test this out, and after the first 5 meetings lower the per meeting fee if the conditions are met. We can cap the amount spent per month if budget is an issue, but not less than $2000/month.

I understand your concern about the quality of leads. What we always guarantee is that we are reaching out to people matching the target customer profiles we'll define together during the onboarding process (their seniority and job titles will match your ICP). The person you will be meeting is someone who is genuinely interested in knowing more about your services and wishes to learn about what you offer. We cannot vouch that the prospect is willing to buy immediately or has an open project.

Is there anything else I can help you with your decision process? If a quick chat would help, please let me know and I'm happy to find time to hop on a quick call.

-- END OF MESSAGE --

EVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)
SUBJECT: Front: Re: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio
SENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio
TIME: 2024-01-23 21:46:51.081000+00:00

BODY:

Hunter,

Thanks for the prompt response.

In terms of the quality of the meetings, I hear you and understand what you mean. In a way, yes, we are motivated to book as many meetings as possible, but we are also highly incentivised to ensure the quality of these calls. As you have no long term commitment to us, we need to deliver you good leads, otherwise, we are out of business. We are not forcing anyone to take a call with you and in our experience prospects responding to cold outreach already self-qualify when they take a call. These are not academic researchers who are always happy to talk but rather value their time.

I suggest we proceed with the Pilot Phase of 5 meetings, after which we sit down and evaluate the whole collaboration from all the various perspectives - the conversion rates, lowering the per meeting fee from $600 to $540, how many meetings we can realistically book for you on a weekly/monthly basis ... After the first 5 meetings you will also have some idea of the types of people we are able to bring to you.

At the beginning, we are fine to focus on small and mid-cap companies.

During the collaboration, we are open to adjusting the budget on a monthly basis.

So as a next step, I suggest we proceed with our standard agreement and plan to sit down after the pilot phase.

Let me know when you manage to review the agreement.

-- END OF MESSAGE --

EVENT TYPE: meeting (Bidirectional)
SUBJECT: Calendly: Intro to Meetings.bio
SENDERS: None
TIME: 2024-01-16 21:00:00+00:00

BODY:

<strong>Location: </strong>https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83000112016?pwd=NzBCMVVqMTh0S3ZaT2M2YWFEVjg2Zz09</br></br><strong>Contact's Time Zone: </strong>Eastern Time - US & Canada</br></br>

-- END OF MESSAGE --

EVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)
SUBJECT: Front: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio
SENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio
TIME: 2024-01-17 08:13:44.181000+00:00

BODY:

Hi Hunter,

It was great talking to you, thank you for your and Chris' time.

Attached is an overview of our services and a sample agreement for your review.

I look forward to hearing back from you towards the end of the month.

Klemen

-- END OF MESSAGE --

-=-

To avoid any doubt, this is the LAST EVENT:

EVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)
SUBJECT: Front: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio
SENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio
TIME: 2024-01-17 08:13:44.181000+00:00

BODY:

Hi Hunter,

It was great talking to you, thank you for your and Chris' time.

Attached is an overview of our services and a sample agreement for your review.

I look forward to hearing back from you towards the end of the month.

Klemen

-- END OF MESSAGE --

-=-

ADDITIONAL CONTEXT:

DEAL NAME: Workflow Informatics
OFFERING: None
DEAL OWNER: Klemen Hrovat
DEAL OWNER EMAIL: klemen@meetings.bio
DEAL OWNER COMPANY: Meetings.bio
PROSPECT NAME: Hunter Philips
PROSPECT COMPANY: Workflow Informatics

Response
{
  "id": "chatcmpl-9Cnum7sHLq24g7lfEleObgvybqMaa",
  "model": "gpt-4-0125-preview",
  "usage": {
    "total_tokens": 2290,
    "prompt_tokens": 2155,
    "completion_tokens": 135
  },
  "object": "chat.completion",
  "choices": [
    {
      "index": 0,
      "message": {
        "role": "assistant",
        "content": null,
        "function_call": {
          "name": "format_response",
          "arguments": "{\"subject_line\":\"Quick Update Needed on Meetings.bio Agreement\",\"recipients\":[\"hunter@workflowinformatics.com\"],\"greeting\":\"Hi Hunter,\",\"opening_line\":\"I hope you've had a chance to review the agreement we discussed.\",\"body\":\"It's been a while since we last touched base regarding the agreement and our proposed collaboration. We're keen to move forward with the pilot phase and start delivering value to Workflow Informatics. Your feedback on the agreement and any further questions you might have are crucial for us to proceed. We aim to tailor our services to best fit your needs and ensure a successful partnership.\",\"closing\":\"Looking forward to your feedback.\",\"signature\":\"Best, Klemen\"}"
        }
      },
      "logprobs": null,
      "finish_reason": "stop"
    }
  ],
  "created": 1712838836,
  "system_fingerprint": "fp_122114e45f"
}

END ACTION (at 2024-04-11 12:34:03)

BEGIN ACTION in CREATE_TASK_FOR_DEFAULT_REMINDER (at 2024-04-11 12:40:00)

Context
{
  "events": [
    {
      "id": 23413,
      "body": "Hi Hunter,\n\nThank you for your patience.\n\nCan you maybe elaborate on what you mean by validated/quality prospect?\n\nIn terms of the per-meeting fee, it is hard for us to lower it, as we already take a lot of risk with no fixed costs for you. We are open to lowering the per meeting fee by 10%, down to $540, but only if your product-market-fit is strong enough so we can deliver min. 2 meetings/month on average. We also need to be able to contact at least 1,000 prospects per campaign. I suggest we use the pilot phase to test this out, and after the first 5 meetings lower the per meeting fee if the conditions are met. We can cap the amount spent per month if budget is an issue, but not less than $2000/month.\n\nI understand your concern about the quality of leads. What we always guarantee is that we are reaching out to people matching the target customer profiles we'll define together during the onboarding process (their seniority and job titles will match your ICP). The person you will be meeting is someone who is genuinely interested in knowing more about your services and wishes to learn about what you offer. We cannot vouch that the prospect is willing to buy immediately or has an open project.\n\nIs there anything else I can help you with your decision process? If a quick chat would help, please let me know and I'm happy to find time to hop on a quick call.",
      "type": "email",
      "title": "Front: Re: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio",
      "sender": "klemen@meetings.bio",
      "persons": [
        {
          "emails": [
            "hunter.philips@workflowinformatics.com"
          ],
          "full_name": "Hunter Philips",
          "last_name": "Philips",
          "first_name": "Hunter",
          "organizations": []
        }
      ],
      "direction": "EventDirection.OUTBOUND",
      "timestamp": "2024-01-22T22:21:43.217Z",
      "message_id": null,
      "recipients": [],
      "cc_recipients": [],
      "bcc_recipients": []
    },
    {
      "id": 23422,
      "body": "Hunter,\n\nThanks for the prompt response.\n\nIn terms of the quality of the meetings, I hear you and understand what you mean. In a way, yes, we are motivated to book as many meetings as possible, but we are also highly incentivised to ensure the quality of these calls. As you have no long term commitment to us, we need to deliver you good leads, otherwise, we are out of business. We are not forcing anyone to take a call with you and in our experience prospects responding to cold outreach already self-qualify when they take a call. These are not academic researchers who are always happy to talk but rather value their time.\n\nI suggest we proceed with the Pilot Phase of 5 meetings, after which we sit down and evaluate the whole collaboration from all the various perspectives - the conversion rates, lowering the per meeting fee from $600 to $540, how many meetings we can realistically book for you on a weekly/monthly basis ... After the first 5 meetings you will also have some idea of the types of people we are able to bring to you.\n\nAt the beginning, we are fine to focus on small and mid-cap companies.\n\nDuring the collaboration, we are open to adjusting the budget on a monthly basis.\n\nSo as a next step, I suggest we proceed with our standard agreement and plan to sit down after the pilot phase.\n\nLet me know when you manage to review the agreement.",
      "type": "email",
      "title": "Front: Re: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio",
      "sender": "klemen@meetings.bio",
      "persons": [
        {
          "emails": [
            "hunter.philips@workflowinformatics.com"
          ],
          "full_name": "Hunter Philips",
          "last_name": "Philips",
          "first_name": "Hunter",
          "organizations": []
        }
      ],
      "direction": "EventDirection.OUTBOUND",
      "timestamp": "2024-01-23T21:46:51.081Z",
      "message_id": null,
      "recipients": [],
      "cc_recipients": [],
      "bcc_recipients": []
    },
    {
      "id": 1618,
      "body": "<strong>Location: </strong>https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83000112016?pwd=NzBCMVVqMTh0S3ZaT2M2YWFEVjg2Zz09</br></br><strong>Contact's Time Zone: </strong>Eastern Time - US & Canada</br></br>",
      "type": "meeting",
      "title": "Calendly: Intro to Meetings.bio",
      "sender": null,
      "persons": [
        {
          "emails": [
            "hunter.philips@workflowinformatics.com"
          ],
          "full_name": "Hunter Philips",
          "last_name": "Philips",
          "first_name": "Hunter",
          "organizations": []
        }
      ],
      "direction": "EventDirection.BIDIRECTIONAL",
      "timestamp": "2024-01-16T21:00:00Z",
      "message_id": null,
      "recipients": null,
      "cc_recipients": null,
      "bcc_recipients": null
    },
    {
      "id": 23407,
      "body": "Hi Hunter,\n\nIt was great talking to you, thank you for your and Chris' time.\n\nAttached is an overview of our services and a sample agreement for your review.\n\nI look forward to hearing back from you towards the end of the month.\n\nKlemen",
      "type": "email",
      "title": "Front: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio",
      "sender": "klemen@meetings.bio",
      "persons": [
        {
          "emails": [
            "hunter.philips@workflowinformatics.com"
          ],
          "full_name": "Hunter Philips",
          "last_name": "Philips",
          "first_name": "Hunter",
          "organizations": []
        }
      ],
      "direction": "EventDirection.OUTBOUND",
      "timestamp": "2024-01-17T08:13:44.181Z",
      "message_id": null,
      "recipients": [],
      "cc_recipients": [],
      "bcc_recipients": []
    }
  ],
  "offering": null,
  "deal_name": "Workflow Informatics",
  "prospects": [
    {
      "emails": [
        "hunter.philips@workflowinformatics.com"
      ],
      "full_name": "Hunter Philips",
      "last_name": "Philips",
      "first_name": "Hunter",
      "organizations": [
        {
          "name": "Workflow Informatics",
          "domains": [
            "workflowinformatics.com"
          ],
          "industry": "COMPUTER_SOFTWARE",
          "description": "Workflow Informatics Corp. is a company that specializes in architecting and automating research informatics workflows. They optimize these workflows through software development and configuration, with a focus on facilitating drug discovery. Their ser..."
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "deal_owner_email": "klemen@meetings.bio",
  "primary_prospect": {
    "emails": [
      "hunter.philips@workflowinformatics.com"
    ],
    "full_name": "Hunter Philips",
    "last_name": "Philips",
    "first_name": "Hunter",
    "organizations": [
      {
        "name": "Workflow Informatics",
        "domains": [
          "workflowinformatics.com"
        ],
        "industry": "COMPUTER_SOFTWARE",
        "description": "Workflow Informatics Corp. is a company that specializes in architecting and automating research informatics workflows. They optimize these workflows through software development and configuration, with a focus on facilitating drug discovery. Their ser..."
      }
    ]
  },
  "deal_owner_full_name": "Klemen Hrovat",
  "deal_owner_last_name": "Hrovat",
  "deal_owner_first_name": "Klemen",
  "deal_owner_customer_name": "Meetings.bio",
  "deal_owner_customer_domain": "meetings.bio",
  "primary_prospect_organization": {
    "name": "Workflow Informatics",
    "domains": [
      "workflowinformatics.com"
    ],
    "industry": "COMPUTER_SOFTWARE",
    "description": "Workflow Informatics Corp. is a company that specializes in architecting and automating research informatics workflows. They optimize these workflows through software development and configuration, with a focus on facilitating drug discovery. Their ser..."
  }
}

Entity
{
  "id": 32014,
  "deal": {
    "id": 541,
    "name": "Workflow Informatics",
    "owner": 2,
    "stage": 6,
    "public_id": "7c9dc99a-426f-48cd-be76-522410895551",
    "external_id": "17164079220",
    "last_modified_in_crm": null
  },
  "vars": {
    "pipeline_stage": "CLOSING",
    "pipeline_stage_binary": [
      "CLOSING"
    ]
  },
  "state": "CREATE_TASK_FOR_DEFAULT_REMINDER",
  "status": "IN_PROGRESS",
  "next_task": 1120,
  "events_hash": "b2c969ca8aa1ffee404d3e1b82fef068700c9def",
  "fingerprint": {
    "events": "b2c969ca8aa1ffee404d3e1b82fef068700c9def",
    "offering": "2ef87dc4b9c9e813e0e0433d7547e6b7541d95f5",
    "prospect": "2e3c86d31a9a82b7f0f95a69b591ba8910bc8724",
    "deal_owner": "ec6bf4d5effdd54ce2a619ab6b933981f503e715"
  },
  "next_task_key": null
}

--- MODEL INVOCATION 'generate_reminder_email 0 CLAUDE_3_SONNET' at cost $0.0124 (at 2024-04-11 12:40:00)

Prompt
{
  "model": "claude-3-sonnet-20240229",
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "system",
      "content": "The user will provide text that you need to parse into a structured form.\nTo validate your response, you must call the `format_response` function.\nUse the provided text and context to extract, deduce, or infer\nany parameters needed by `format_response`, including any missing data.\n\nAlso note that: You are a professional sales email writer. Your task is to write a follow-up email. This email will be sent by the seller Klemen Hrovat from Meetings.bio. Be mindful of the fact that Klemen Hrovat has already reached out to the prospect but has not heard back. The email needs to have the following components:\n\n* subject_line - Email subject line. Short and to the point.\n\n* recipients - List of recipients of this email. Be careful to only include the recipients (or one single recipient) with which you were communicating in the last email exchanges. Do not add other recipients if not explicitly requested or required.\n\n* greeting - Salutation. Greets the recipients of this email. It is important to inspect the past conversation and address the recipients in a similar manner when it comes to the register. Consider only short greetings like \"Hi (recipient's first name),\" or \"Dear Dr. (recipient's surname),\" depending on the chosen register.\n\n* opening_line - The opening line of the email. It should be a continuation of the greeting and should be a short sentence that leads to the body of the email. The opening line should be between 10 and 20 words.\n\n\n* body - The body of the email. To write the body, follow these rules:\n  - Needs to remind your prospect (buyer) to respond to your last enquiry.\n  - Be mindful of the fact that Klemen Hrovat has already reached out to the prospect but has not heard back. \n  - If you do need to mention the date of the last communication event, do not mention it explicitly, use relative time instead (last week, yesterday, two days ago...). \n  - Do **NOT** start the body with \"I hope this email finds you well\", \"We haven't had a chance to connect\", \"I haven't heard from you\", \"touching base\", \"just checking in\", \"wanted to circle back\", and similar email openings as they provide no value to the recipient. Simply start with the point, do not include any uninformative opening sentence. \n  - Do not start the first sentence with \"Following our last conversation\" or a something similar. Simply omit this part and go straight to the point.\n  - Do not include any opening or closing statements in the body. Limit the body only to informative and to the point content. \n  - Mimic the register from the past conversation. \n  - Do not repeat information or courtesy sentences from the previous emails. \n  - The length of the body should be between 50 and 120 words. \n  - Go straight to the point without too much fluff, but keep it kind and polite.\n\n* closing - A courtesy closing statement. Tell the recipient that you are looking forward to their reply. Keep it very short, one short sentence only.\n\n* signature - Sender's signature. Only include a very basic farewell-line like \"Thanks, Klemen\", \"Best, Klemen\", \"Regards, Klemen\". Do NOT generate full Klemen Hrovat's signature.\n\n--\n\nALSO IMPORTANT:\n\n* Carefully examine the last communication event from the prospect (buyer) and the last communication event from the seller. These two events will give you the most relevant information on how to write your email.\n* Do not repeat information or courtesy sentences from the previous emails that the seller has already sent. For example, if the seller already expressed best new year's wishes in the previous email, do not repeat them in this email.\n* The email content needs to be in the same language as the rest of the communication in the context.\n\n\nThe following is the correspondence between the buyer and the seller. The last event in this list is the latest one. The latest event is probably the most important one for making a decision.\n\n\n\nYou have been provided the following context to perform your task:\n    - The current time is 2024-04-11 12:40:00.943507."
    },
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "The text to parse:\nEVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)\nSUBJECT: Front: Re: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio\nSENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio\nTIME: 2024-01-22 22:21:43.217000+00:00\n\nBODY:\n\nHi Hunter,\n\nThank you for your patience.\n\nCan you maybe elaborate on what you mean by validated/quality prospect?\n\nIn terms of the per-meeting fee, it is hard for us to lower it, as we already take a lot of risk with no fixed costs for you. We are open to lowering the per meeting fee by 10%, down to $540, but only if your product-market-fit is strong enough so we can deliver min. 2 meetings/month on average. We also need to be able to contact at least 1,000 prospects per campaign. I suggest we use the pilot phase to test this out, and after the first 5 meetings lower the per meeting fee if the conditions are met. We can cap the amount spent per month if budget is an issue, but not less than $2000/month.\n\nI understand your concern about the quality of leads. What we always guarantee is that we are reaching out to people matching the target customer profiles we'll define together during the onboarding process (their seniority and job titles will match your ICP). The person you will be meeting is someone who is genuinely interested in knowing more about your services and wishes to learn about what you offer. We cannot vouch that the prospect is willing to buy immediately or has an open project.\n\nIs there anything else I can help you with your decision process? If a quick chat would help, please let me know and I'm happy to find time to hop on a quick call.\n\n-- END OF MESSAGE --\n\nEVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)\nSUBJECT: Front: Re: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio\nSENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio\nTIME: 2024-01-23 21:46:51.081000+00:00\n\nBODY:\n\nHunter,\n\nThanks for the prompt response.\n\nIn terms of the quality of the meetings, I hear you and understand what you mean. In a way, yes, we are motivated to book as many meetings as possible, but we are also highly incentivised to ensure the quality of these calls. As you have no long term commitment to us, we need to deliver you good leads, otherwise, we are out of business. We are not forcing anyone to take a call with you and in our experience prospects responding to cold outreach already self-qualify when they take a call. These are not academic researchers who are always happy to talk but rather value their time.\n\nI suggest we proceed with the Pilot Phase of 5 meetings, after which we sit down and evaluate the whole collaboration from all the various perspectives - the conversion rates, lowering the per meeting fee from $600 to $540, how many meetings we can realistically book for you on a weekly/monthly basis ... After the first 5 meetings you will also have some idea of the types of people we are able to bring to you.\n\nAt the beginning, we are fine to focus on small and mid-cap companies.\n\nDuring the collaboration, we are open to adjusting the budget on a monthly basis.\n\nSo as a next step, I suggest we proceed with our standard agreement and plan to sit down after the pilot phase.\n\nLet me know when you manage to review the agreement.\n\n-- END OF MESSAGE --\n\nEVENT TYPE: meeting (Bidirectional)\nSUBJECT: Calendly: Intro to Meetings.bio\nSENDERS: None\nTIME: 2024-01-16 21:00:00+00:00\n\nBODY:\n\n<strong>Location: </strong>https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83000112016?pwd=NzBCMVVqMTh0S3ZaT2M2YWFEVjg2Zz09</br></br><strong>Contact's Time Zone: </strong>Eastern Time - US & Canada</br></br>\n\n-- END OF MESSAGE --\n\nEVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)\nSUBJECT: Front: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio\nSENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio\nTIME: 2024-01-17 08:13:44.181000+00:00\n\nBODY:\n\nHi Hunter,\n\nIt was great talking to you, thank you for your and Chris' time.\n\nAttached is an overview of our services and a sample agreement for your review.\n\nI look forward to hearing back from you towards the end of the month.\n\nKlemen\n\n-- END OF MESSAGE --\n\n-=-\n\nTo avoid any doubt, this is the LAST EVENT:\n\nEVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)\nSUBJECT: Front: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio\nSENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio\nTIME: 2024-01-17 08:13:44.181000+00:00\n\nBODY:\n\nHi Hunter,\n\nIt was great talking to you, thank you for your and Chris' time.\n\nAttached is an overview of our services and a sample agreement for your review.\n\nI look forward to hearing back from you towards the end of the month.\n\nKlemen\n\n-- END OF MESSAGE --\n\n-=-\n\nADDITIONAL CONTEXT:\n\nDEAL NAME: Workflow Informatics\nOFFERING: None\nDEAL OWNER: Klemen Hrovat\nDEAL OWNER EMAIL: klemen@meetings.bio\nDEAL OWNER COMPANY: Meetings.bio\nPROSPECT NAME: Hunter Philips\nPROSPECT COMPANY: Workflow Informatics"
    }
  ],
  "functions": [
    {
      "name": "format_response",
      "parameters": {
        "type": "object",
        "required": [
          "subject_line",
          "recipients",
          "greeting",
          "opening_line",
          "body",
          "closing",
          "signature"
        ],
        "properties": {
          "body": {
            "type": "string",
            "title": "Body"
          },
          "closing": {
            "type": "string",
            "title": "Closing"
          },
          "greeting": {
            "type": "string",
            "title": "Greeting"
          },
          "signature": {
            "type": "string",
            "title": "Signature"
          },
          "recipients": {
            "type": "array",
            "items": {
              "type": "string"
            },
            "title": "Recipients"
          },
          "opening_line": {
            "type": "string",
            "title": "Opening line"
          },
          "subject_line": {
            "type": "string",
            "title": "Subject line"
          }
        }
      },
      "description": "A representation of the next best possible email the seller needs to send to the buyer (prospect), given the communication between the seller and their buyer, and the information about the deal."
    }
  ],
  "max_tokens": 1500,
  "temperature": 0.0,
  "function_call": {
    "name": "format_response"
  },
  "request_timeout": 600
}

Events
The text to parse:
EVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)
SUBJECT: Front: Re: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio
SENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio
TIME: 2024-01-22 22:21:43.217000+00:00

BODY:

Hi Hunter,

Thank you for your patience.

Can you maybe elaborate on what you mean by validated/quality prospect?

In terms of the per-meeting fee, it is hard for us to lower it, as we already take a lot of risk with no fixed costs for you. We are open to lowering the per meeting fee by 10%, down to $540, but only if your product-market-fit is strong enough so we can deliver min. 2 meetings/month on average. We also need to be able to contact at least 1,000 prospects per campaign. I suggest we use the pilot phase to test this out, and after the first 5 meetings lower the per meeting fee if the conditions are met. We can cap the amount spent per month if budget is an issue, but not less than $2000/month.

I understand your concern about the quality of leads. What we always guarantee is that we are reaching out to people matching the target customer profiles we'll define together during the onboarding process (their seniority and job titles will match your ICP). The person you will be meeting is someone who is genuinely interested in knowing more about your services and wishes to learn about what you offer. We cannot vouch that the prospect is willing to buy immediately or has an open project.

Is there anything else I can help you with your decision process? If a quick chat would help, please let me know and I'm happy to find time to hop on a quick call.

-- END OF MESSAGE --

EVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)
SUBJECT: Front: Re: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio
SENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio
TIME: 2024-01-23 21:46:51.081000+00:00

BODY:

Hunter,

Thanks for the prompt response.

In terms of the quality of the meetings, I hear you and understand what you mean. In a way, yes, we are motivated to book as many meetings as possible, but we are also highly incentivised to ensure the quality of these calls. As you have no long term commitment to us, we need to deliver you good leads, otherwise, we are out of business. We are not forcing anyone to take a call with you and in our experience prospects responding to cold outreach already self-qualify when they take a call. These are not academic researchers who are always happy to talk but rather value their time.

I suggest we proceed with the Pilot Phase of 5 meetings, after which we sit down and evaluate the whole collaboration from all the various perspectives - the conversion rates, lowering the per meeting fee from $600 to $540, how many meetings we can realistically book for you on a weekly/monthly basis ... After the first 5 meetings you will also have some idea of the types of people we are able to bring to you.

At the beginning, we are fine to focus on small and mid-cap companies.

During the collaboration, we are open to adjusting the budget on a monthly basis.

So as a next step, I suggest we proceed with our standard agreement and plan to sit down after the pilot phase.

Let me know when you manage to review the agreement.

-- END OF MESSAGE --

EVENT TYPE: meeting (Bidirectional)
SUBJECT: Calendly: Intro to Meetings.bio
SENDERS: None
TIME: 2024-01-16 21:00:00+00:00

BODY:

<strong>Location: </strong>https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83000112016?pwd=NzBCMVVqMTh0S3ZaT2M2YWFEVjg2Zz09</br></br><strong>Contact's Time Zone: </strong>Eastern Time - US & Canada</br></br>

-- END OF MESSAGE --

EVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)
SUBJECT: Front: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio
SENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio
TIME: 2024-01-17 08:13:44.181000+00:00

BODY:

Hi Hunter,

It was great talking to you, thank you for your and Chris' time.

Attached is an overview of our services and a sample agreement for your review.

I look forward to hearing back from you towards the end of the month.

Klemen

-- END OF MESSAGE --

-=-

To avoid any doubt, this is the LAST EVENT:

EVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)
SUBJECT: Front: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio
SENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio
TIME: 2024-01-17 08:13:44.181000+00:00

BODY:

Hi Hunter,

It was great talking to you, thank you for your and Chris' time.

Attached is an overview of our services and a sample agreement for your review.

I look forward to hearing back from you towards the end of the month.

Klemen

-- END OF MESSAGE --

-=-

ADDITIONAL CONTEXT:

DEAL NAME: Workflow Informatics
OFFERING: None
DEAL OWNER: Klemen Hrovat
DEAL OWNER EMAIL: klemen@meetings.bio
DEAL OWNER COMPANY: Meetings.bio
PROSPECT NAME: Hunter Philips
PROSPECT COMPANY: Workflow Informatics

Response
{
  "id": "msg_017BZFZbRt2GvNgLCtxLTZwa",
  "model": "claude-3-sonnet-20240229",
  "usage": {
    "total_tokens": 2897,
    "prompt_tokens": 2591,
    "completion_tokens": 306
  },
  "object": "chat.completion",
  "choices": [
    {
      "index": 0,
      "message": {
        "role": "assistant",
        "content": null,
        "function_call": {
          "name": "format_response",
          "arguments": "{\"subject_line\": \"Quick follow-up about Workflow Informatics\", \"recipients\": [\"hunter@workflowinformatics.com\"], \"greeting\": \"Hi Hunter,\", \"opening_line\": \"I wanted to circle back regarding our discussion on partnering with Meetings.bio for qualified sales meetings.\", \"body\": \"As mentioned in my previous email a couple of months ago, I suggest we proceed with a pilot phase of 5 meetings to evaluate the quality and fit. This will allow you to experience our process firsthand and determine if the leads meet your expectations for Workflow Informatics. Afterwards, we can discuss potential adjustments like lowering the per meeting fee based on the results.\", \"closing\": \"I look forward to your thoughts on moving ahead.\", \"signature\": \"Best, Klemen\"}"
        }
      },
      "logprobs": null,
      "finish_reason": "stop"
    }
  ],
  "created": 1712839211
}

END ACTION (at 2024-04-11 12:40:11)

BEGIN ACTION in CREATE_TASK_FOR_DEFAULT_REMINDER (at 2024-04-11 12:57:17)

Context
{
  "events": [
    {
      "id": 23413,
      "body": "Hi Hunter,\n\nThank you for your patience.\n\nCan you maybe elaborate on what you mean by validated/quality prospect?\n\nIn terms of the per-meeting fee, it is hard for us to lower it, as we already take a lot of risk with no fixed costs for you. We are open to lowering the per meeting fee by 10%, down to $540, but only if your product-market-fit is strong enough so we can deliver min. 2 meetings/month on average. We also need to be able to contact at least 1,000 prospects per campaign. I suggest we use the pilot phase to test this out, and after the first 5 meetings lower the per meeting fee if the conditions are met. We can cap the amount spent per month if budget is an issue, but not less than $2000/month.\n\nI understand your concern about the quality of leads. What we always guarantee is that we are reaching out to people matching the target customer profiles we'll define together during the onboarding process (their seniority and job titles will match your ICP). The person you will be meeting is someone who is genuinely interested in knowing more about your services and wishes to learn about what you offer. We cannot vouch that the prospect is willing to buy immediately or has an open project.\n\nIs there anything else I can help you with your decision process? If a quick chat would help, please let me know and I'm happy to find time to hop on a quick call.",
      "type": "email",
      "title": "Front: Re: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio",
      "sender": "klemen@meetings.bio",
      "persons": [
        {
          "emails": [
            "hunter.philips@workflowinformatics.com"
          ],
          "full_name": "Hunter Philips",
          "last_name": "Philips",
          "first_name": "Hunter",
          "organizations": []
        }
      ],
      "direction": "EventDirection.OUTBOUND",
      "timestamp": "2024-01-22T22:21:43.217Z",
      "message_id": null,
      "recipients": [],
      "cc_recipients": [],
      "bcc_recipients": []
    },
    {
      "id": 23422,
      "body": "Hunter,\n\nThanks for the prompt response.\n\nIn terms of the quality of the meetings, I hear you and understand what you mean. In a way, yes, we are motivated to book as many meetings as possible, but we are also highly incentivised to ensure the quality of these calls. As you have no long term commitment to us, we need to deliver you good leads, otherwise, we are out of business. We are not forcing anyone to take a call with you and in our experience prospects responding to cold outreach already self-qualify when they take a call. These are not academic researchers who are always happy to talk but rather value their time.\n\nI suggest we proceed with the Pilot Phase of 5 meetings, after which we sit down and evaluate the whole collaboration from all the various perspectives - the conversion rates, lowering the per meeting fee from $600 to $540, how many meetings we can realistically book for you on a weekly/monthly basis ... After the first 5 meetings you will also have some idea of the types of people we are able to bring to you.\n\nAt the beginning, we are fine to focus on small and mid-cap companies.\n\nDuring the collaboration, we are open to adjusting the budget on a monthly basis.\n\nSo as a next step, I suggest we proceed with our standard agreement and plan to sit down after the pilot phase.\n\nLet me know when you manage to review the agreement.",
      "type": "email",
      "title": "Front: Re: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio",
      "sender": "klemen@meetings.bio",
      "persons": [
        {
          "emails": [
            "hunter.philips@workflowinformatics.com"
          ],
          "full_name": "Hunter Philips",
          "last_name": "Philips",
          "first_name": "Hunter",
          "organizations": []
        }
      ],
      "direction": "EventDirection.OUTBOUND",
      "timestamp": "2024-01-23T21:46:51.081Z",
      "message_id": null,
      "recipients": [],
      "cc_recipients": [],
      "bcc_recipients": []
    },
    {
      "id": 1618,
      "body": "<strong>Location: </strong>https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83000112016?pwd=NzBCMVVqMTh0S3ZaT2M2YWFEVjg2Zz09</br></br><strong>Contact's Time Zone: </strong>Eastern Time - US & Canada</br></br>",
      "type": "meeting",
      "title": "Calendly: Intro to Meetings.bio",
      "sender": null,
      "persons": [
        {
          "emails": [
            "hunter.philips@workflowinformatics.com"
          ],
          "full_name": "Hunter Philips",
          "last_name": "Philips",
          "first_name": "Hunter",
          "organizations": []
        }
      ],
      "direction": "EventDirection.BIDIRECTIONAL",
      "timestamp": "2024-01-16T21:00:00Z",
      "message_id": null,
      "recipients": null,
      "cc_recipients": null,
      "bcc_recipients": null
    },
    {
      "id": 23407,
      "body": "Hi Hunter,\n\nIt was great talking to you, thank you for your and Chris' time.\n\nAttached is an overview of our services and a sample agreement for your review.\n\nI look forward to hearing back from you towards the end of the month.\n\nKlemen",
      "type": "email",
      "title": "Front: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio",
      "sender": "klemen@meetings.bio",
      "persons": [
        {
          "emails": [
            "hunter.philips@workflowinformatics.com"
          ],
          "full_name": "Hunter Philips",
          "last_name": "Philips",
          "first_name": "Hunter",
          "organizations": []
        }
      ],
      "direction": "EventDirection.OUTBOUND",
      "timestamp": "2024-01-17T08:13:44.181Z",
      "message_id": null,
      "recipients": [],
      "cc_recipients": [],
      "bcc_recipients": []
    }
  ],
  "offering": null,
  "deal_name": "Workflow Informatics",
  "prospects": [
    {
      "emails": [
        "hunter.philips@workflowinformatics.com"
      ],
      "full_name": "Hunter Philips",
      "last_name": "Philips",
      "first_name": "Hunter",
      "organizations": [
        {
          "name": "Workflow Informatics",
          "domains": [
            "workflowinformatics.com"
          ],
          "industry": "COMPUTER_SOFTWARE",
          "description": "Workflow Informatics Corp. is a company that specializes in architecting and automating research informatics workflows. They optimize these workflows through software development and configuration, with a focus on facilitating drug discovery. Their ser..."
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "deal_owner_email": "klemen@meetings.bio",
  "primary_prospect": {
    "emails": [
      "hunter.philips@workflowinformatics.com"
    ],
    "full_name": "Hunter Philips",
    "last_name": "Philips",
    "first_name": "Hunter",
    "organizations": [
      {
        "name": "Workflow Informatics",
        "domains": [
          "workflowinformatics.com"
        ],
        "industry": "COMPUTER_SOFTWARE",
        "description": "Workflow Informatics Corp. is a company that specializes in architecting and automating research informatics workflows. They optimize these workflows through software development and configuration, with a focus on facilitating drug discovery. Their ser..."
      }
    ]
  },
  "deal_owner_full_name": "Klemen Hrovat",
  "deal_owner_last_name": "Hrovat",
  "deal_owner_first_name": "Klemen",
  "deal_owner_customer_name": "Meetings.bio",
  "deal_owner_customer_domain": "meetings.bio",
  "primary_prospect_organization": {
    "name": "Workflow Informatics",
    "domains": [
      "workflowinformatics.com"
    ],
    "industry": "COMPUTER_SOFTWARE",
    "description": "Workflow Informatics Corp. is a company that specializes in architecting and automating research informatics workflows. They optimize these workflows through software development and configuration, with a focus on facilitating drug discovery. Their ser..."
  }
}

Entity
{
  "id": 32014,
  "deal": {
    "id": 541,
    "name": "Workflow Informatics",
    "owner": 2,
    "stage": 6,
    "public_id": "7c9dc99a-426f-48cd-be76-522410895551",
    "external_id": "17164079220",
    "last_modified_in_crm": null
  },
  "vars": {
    "pipeline_stage": "CLOSING",
    "pipeline_stage_binary": [
      "CLOSING"
    ]
  },
  "state": "CREATE_TASK_FOR_DEFAULT_REMINDER",
  "status": "IN_PROGRESS",
  "next_task": 1145,
  "events_hash": "b2c969ca8aa1ffee404d3e1b82fef068700c9def",
  "fingerprint": {
    "events": "b2c969ca8aa1ffee404d3e1b82fef068700c9def",
    "offering": "2ef87dc4b9c9e813e0e0433d7547e6b7541d95f5",
    "prospect": "2e3c86d31a9a82b7f0f95a69b591ba8910bc8724",
    "deal_owner": "ec6bf4d5effdd54ce2a619ab6b933981f503e715"
  },
  "next_task_key": null
}

--- MODEL INVOCATION 'generate_reminder_email 0 CLAUDE_3_OPUS' at cost $0.0918 (at 2024-04-11 12:57:17)

Prompt
{
  "model": "claude-3-opus-20240229",
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "system",
      "content": "The user will provide text that you need to parse into a structured form.\nTo validate your response, you must call the `format_response` function.\nUse the provided text and context to extract, deduce, or infer\nany parameters needed by `format_response`, including any missing data.\n\nAlso note that: You are a professional sales email writer. Your task is to write a follow-up email. This email will be sent by the seller Klemen Hrovat from Meetings.bio. Be mindful of the fact that Klemen Hrovat has already reached out to the prospect but has not heard back. The email needs to have the following components:\n\n* subject_line - Email subject line. Short and to the point.\n\n* recipients - List of recipients of this email. Be careful to only include the recipients (or one single recipient) with which you were communicating in the last email exchanges. Do not add other recipients if not explicitly requested or required.\n\n* greeting - Salutation. Greets the recipients of this email. It is important to inspect the past conversation and address the recipients in a similar manner when it comes to the register. Consider only short greetings like \"Hi (recipient's first name),\" or \"Dear Dr. (recipient's surname),\" depending on the chosen register.\n\n* opening_line - The opening line of the email. It should be a continuation of the greeting and should be a short sentence that leads to the body of the email. The opening line should be between 10 and 20 words.\n\n\n* body - The body of the email. To write the body, follow these rules:\n  - Needs to remind your prospect (buyer) to respond to your last enquiry.\n  - Be mindful of the fact that Klemen Hrovat has already reached out to the prospect but has not heard back. \n  - If you do need to mention the date of the last communication event, do not mention it explicitly, use relative time instead (last week, yesterday, two days ago...). \n  - Do **NOT** start the body with \"I hope this email finds you well\", \"We haven't had a chance to connect\", \"I haven't heard from you\", \"touching base\", \"just checking in\", \"wanted to circle back\", and similar email openings as they provide no value to the recipient. Simply start with the point, do not include any uninformative opening sentence. \n  - Do not start the first sentence with \"Following our last conversation\" or a something similar. Simply omit this part and go straight to the point.\n  - Do not include any opening or closing statements in the body. Limit the body only to informative and to the point content. \n  - Mimic the register from the past conversation. \n  - Do not repeat information or courtesy sentences from the previous emails. \n  - The length of the body should be between 50 and 120 words. \n  - Go straight to the point without too much fluff, but keep it kind and polite.\n\n* closing - A courtesy closing statement. Tell the recipient that you are looking forward to their reply. Keep it very short, one short sentence only.\n\n* signature - Sender's signature. Only include a very basic farewell-line like \"Thanks, Klemen\", \"Best, Klemen\", \"Regards, Klemen\". Do NOT generate full Klemen Hrovat's signature.\n\n--\n\nALSO IMPORTANT:\n\n* Carefully examine the last communication event from the prospect (buyer) and the last communication event from the seller. These two events will give you the most relevant information on how to write your email.\n* Do not repeat information or courtesy sentences from the previous emails that the seller has already sent. For example, if the seller already expressed best new year's wishes in the previous email, do not repeat them in this email.\n* The email content needs to be in the same language as the rest of the communication in the context.\n\n\nThe following is the correspondence between the buyer and the seller. The last event in this list is the latest one. The latest event is probably the most important one for making a decision.\n\n\n\nYou have been provided the following context to perform your task:\n    - The current time is 2024-04-11 12:57:17.830095."
    },
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "The text to parse:\nEVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)\nSUBJECT: Front: Re: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio\nSENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio\nTIME: 2024-01-22 22:21:43.217000+00:00\n\nBODY:\n\nHi Hunter,\n\nThank you for your patience.\n\nCan you maybe elaborate on what you mean by validated/quality prospect?\n\nIn terms of the per-meeting fee, it is hard for us to lower it, as we already take a lot of risk with no fixed costs for you. We are open to lowering the per meeting fee by 10%, down to $540, but only if your product-market-fit is strong enough so we can deliver min. 2 meetings/month on average. We also need to be able to contact at least 1,000 prospects per campaign. I suggest we use the pilot phase to test this out, and after the first 5 meetings lower the per meeting fee if the conditions are met. We can cap the amount spent per month if budget is an issue, but not less than $2000/month.\n\nI understand your concern about the quality of leads. What we always guarantee is that we are reaching out to people matching the target customer profiles we'll define together during the onboarding process (their seniority and job titles will match your ICP). The person you will be meeting is someone who is genuinely interested in knowing more about your services and wishes to learn about what you offer. We cannot vouch that the prospect is willing to buy immediately or has an open project.\n\nIs there anything else I can help you with your decision process? If a quick chat would help, please let me know and I'm happy to find time to hop on a quick call.\n\n-- END OF MESSAGE --\n\nEVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)\nSUBJECT: Front: Re: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio\nSENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio\nTIME: 2024-01-23 21:46:51.081000+00:00\n\nBODY:\n\nHunter,\n\nThanks for the prompt response.\n\nIn terms of the quality of the meetings, I hear you and understand what you mean. In a way, yes, we are motivated to book as many meetings as possible, but we are also highly incentivised to ensure the quality of these calls. As you have no long term commitment to us, we need to deliver you good leads, otherwise, we are out of business. We are not forcing anyone to take a call with you and in our experience prospects responding to cold outreach already self-qualify when they take a call. These are not academic researchers who are always happy to talk but rather value their time.\n\nI suggest we proceed with the Pilot Phase of 5 meetings, after which we sit down and evaluate the whole collaboration from all the various perspectives - the conversion rates, lowering the per meeting fee from $600 to $540, how many meetings we can realistically book for you on a weekly/monthly basis ... After the first 5 meetings you will also have some idea of the types of people we are able to bring to you.\n\nAt the beginning, we are fine to focus on small and mid-cap companies.\n\nDuring the collaboration, we are open to adjusting the budget on a monthly basis.\n\nSo as a next step, I suggest we proceed with our standard agreement and plan to sit down after the pilot phase.\n\nLet me know when you manage to review the agreement.\n\n-- END OF MESSAGE --\n\nEVENT TYPE: meeting (Bidirectional)\nSUBJECT: Calendly: Intro to Meetings.bio\nSENDERS: None\nTIME: 2024-01-16 21:00:00+00:00\n\nBODY:\n\n<strong>Location: </strong>https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83000112016?pwd=NzBCMVVqMTh0S3ZaT2M2YWFEVjg2Zz09</br></br><strong>Contact's Time Zone: </strong>Eastern Time - US & Canada</br></br>\n\n-- END OF MESSAGE --\n\nEVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)\nSUBJECT: Front: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio\nSENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio\nTIME: 2024-01-17 08:13:44.181000+00:00\n\nBODY:\n\nHi Hunter,\n\nIt was great talking to you, thank you for your and Chris' time.\n\nAttached is an overview of our services and a sample agreement for your review.\n\nI look forward to hearing back from you towards the end of the month.\n\nKlemen\n\n-- END OF MESSAGE --\n\n-=-\n\nTo avoid any doubt, this is the LAST EVENT:\n\nEVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)\nSUBJECT: Front: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio\nSENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio\nTIME: 2024-01-17 08:13:44.181000+00:00\n\nBODY:\n\nHi Hunter,\n\nIt was great talking to you, thank you for your and Chris' time.\n\nAttached is an overview of our services and a sample agreement for your review.\n\nI look forward to hearing back from you towards the end of the month.\n\nKlemen\n\n-- END OF MESSAGE --\n\n-=-\n\nADDITIONAL CONTEXT:\n\nDEAL NAME: Workflow Informatics\nOFFERING: None\nDEAL OWNER: Klemen Hrovat\nDEAL OWNER EMAIL: klemen@meetings.bio\nDEAL OWNER COMPANY: Meetings.bio\nPROSPECT NAME: Hunter Philips\nPROSPECT COMPANY: Workflow Informatics"
    }
  ],
  "functions": [
    {
      "name": "format_response",
      "parameters": {
        "type": "object",
        "required": [
          "subject_line",
          "recipients",
          "greeting",
          "opening_line",
          "body",
          "closing",
          "signature"
        ],
        "properties": {
          "body": {
            "type": "string",
            "title": "Body"
          },
          "closing": {
            "type": "string",
            "title": "Closing"
          },
          "greeting": {
            "type": "string",
            "title": "Greeting"
          },
          "signature": {
            "type": "string",
            "title": "Signature"
          },
          "recipients": {
            "type": "array",
            "items": {
              "type": "string"
            },
            "title": "Recipients"
          },
          "opening_line": {
            "type": "string",
            "title": "Opening line"
          },
          "subject_line": {
            "type": "string",
            "title": "Subject line"
          }
        }
      },
      "description": "A representation of the next best possible email the seller needs to send to the buyer (prospect), given the communication between the seller and their buyer, and the information about the deal."
    }
  ],
  "max_tokens": 1500,
  "temperature": 0.0,
  "function_call": {
    "name": "format_response"
  },
  "request_timeout": 600
}

Events
The text to parse:
EVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)
SUBJECT: Front: Re: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio
SENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio
TIME: 2024-01-22 22:21:43.217000+00:00

BODY:

Hi Hunter,

Thank you for your patience.

Can you maybe elaborate on what you mean by validated/quality prospect?

In terms of the per-meeting fee, it is hard for us to lower it, as we already take a lot of risk with no fixed costs for you. We are open to lowering the per meeting fee by 10%, down to $540, but only if your product-market-fit is strong enough so we can deliver min. 2 meetings/month on average. We also need to be able to contact at least 1,000 prospects per campaign. I suggest we use the pilot phase to test this out, and after the first 5 meetings lower the per meeting fee if the conditions are met. We can cap the amount spent per month if budget is an issue, but not less than $2000/month.

I understand your concern about the quality of leads. What we always guarantee is that we are reaching out to people matching the target customer profiles we'll define together during the onboarding process (their seniority and job titles will match your ICP). The person you will be meeting is someone who is genuinely interested in knowing more about your services and wishes to learn about what you offer. We cannot vouch that the prospect is willing to buy immediately or has an open project.

Is there anything else I can help you with your decision process? If a quick chat would help, please let me know and I'm happy to find time to hop on a quick call.

-- END OF MESSAGE --

EVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)
SUBJECT: Front: Re: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio
SENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio
TIME: 2024-01-23 21:46:51.081000+00:00

BODY:

Hunter,

Thanks for the prompt response.

In terms of the quality of the meetings, I hear you and understand what you mean. In a way, yes, we are motivated to book as many meetings as possible, but we are also highly incentivised to ensure the quality of these calls. As you have no long term commitment to us, we need to deliver you good leads, otherwise, we are out of business. We are not forcing anyone to take a call with you and in our experience prospects responding to cold outreach already self-qualify when they take a call. These are not academic researchers who are always happy to talk but rather value their time.

I suggest we proceed with the Pilot Phase of 5 meetings, after which we sit down and evaluate the whole collaboration from all the various perspectives - the conversion rates, lowering the per meeting fee from $600 to $540, how many meetings we can realistically book for you on a weekly/monthly basis ... After the first 5 meetings you will also have some idea of the types of people we are able to bring to you.

At the beginning, we are fine to focus on small and mid-cap companies.

During the collaboration, we are open to adjusting the budget on a monthly basis.

So as a next step, I suggest we proceed with our standard agreement and plan to sit down after the pilot phase.

Let me know when you manage to review the agreement.

-- END OF MESSAGE --

EVENT TYPE: meeting (Bidirectional)
SUBJECT: Calendly: Intro to Meetings.bio
SENDERS: None
TIME: 2024-01-16 21:00:00+00:00

BODY:

<strong>Location: </strong>https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83000112016?pwd=NzBCMVVqMTh0S3ZaT2M2YWFEVjg2Zz09</br></br><strong>Contact's Time Zone: </strong>Eastern Time - US & Canada</br></br>

-- END OF MESSAGE --

EVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)
SUBJECT: Front: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio
SENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio
TIME: 2024-01-17 08:13:44.181000+00:00

BODY:

Hi Hunter,

It was great talking to you, thank you for your and Chris' time.

Attached is an overview of our services and a sample agreement for your review.

I look forward to hearing back from you towards the end of the month.

Klemen

-- END OF MESSAGE --

-=-

To avoid any doubt, this is the LAST EVENT:

EVENT TYPE: email (Outbound)
SUBJECT: Front: Discussion follow up - Meetigns.bio
SENDERS: klemen@meetings.bio
TIME: 2024-01-17 08:13:44.181000+00:00

BODY:

Hi Hunter,

It was great talking to you, thank you for your and Chris' time.

Attached is an overview of our services and a sample agreement for your review.

I look forward to hearing back from you towards the end of the month.

Klemen

-- END OF MESSAGE --

-=-

ADDITIONAL CONTEXT:

DEAL NAME: Workflow Informatics
OFFERING: None
DEAL OWNER: Klemen Hrovat
DEAL OWNER EMAIL: klemen@meetings.bio
DEAL OWNER COMPANY: Meetings.bio
PROSPECT NAME: Hunter Philips
PROSPECT COMPANY: Workflow Informatics

Response
{
  "id": "msg_01Lg8Ukdt3yZWLxMSMPWGP11",
  "model": "claude-3-opus-20240229",
  "usage": {
    "total_tokens": 3488,
    "prompt_tokens": 2830,
    "completion_tokens": 658
  },
  "object": "chat.completion",
  "choices": [
    {
      "index": 0,
      "message": {
        "role": "assistant",
        "content": null,
        "function_call": {
          "name": "format_response",
          "arguments": "{\"subject_line\": \"Re: Discussion follow up - Meetings.bio\", \"recipients\": [\"hunter@workflowinformatics.com\"], \"greeting\": \"Hi Hunter,\", \"opening_line\": \"I wanted to check in on the status of our potential collaboration.\", \"body\": \"We last spoke in January, and in my previous email, I outlined a proposed pilot of 5 meetings, after which we could evaluate the partnership in terms of lead quality, pricing, and volume. I sent over our standard agreement for your review as a next step.\\n\\nI know it's been a busy start to the year, but I wanted to see if you had a chance to look over the agreement and gather any internal feedback. Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns. I'm happy to jump on a quick call to discuss further or clarify anything.\", \"closing\": \"Looking forward to hearing back from you and moving our discussion forward.\", \"signature\": \"Best,\\nKlemen\"}"
        }
      },
      "logprobs": null,
      "finish_reason": "stop"
    }
  ],
  "created": 1712840269
}

END ACTION (at 2024-04-11 12:57:49)